> -----Mensaje original----- > De: Karl Denninger > Enviado el: Sábado, 05 de Septiembre de 2009 21:19 > Para: Alvaro Herrera > CC: Tom Lane; Merlin Moncure; Josh Berkus; > pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] Planner question - "bit" data types > > There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have > the other one in my email system any more to follow up to it. > > I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off. Ciao. > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Karl Denninger escribió: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > You never showed us any EXPLAIN results, > > > Yes I did. Go back and look at the archives. > I provided full EXPLAIN > and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original > query. Sheesh. > > > > You did? Where? This is your first message in this thread: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php > No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen. >
I guess this is the post Karl refers to: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2009-08/msg00088.php Still you can't hope that others will recall a post 2 weeks ago, with an other subject and in an other list! -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
