cb <c...@mythtech.net> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Make sure you're not in the line of fire when (not if) that version >> eats your data. Particularly on Windows, insisting on not >> upgrading that version is unbelievably, irresponsibly stupid. >> There are a *large* number of known bugs. > > > I hear ya, and have agreed with you for a long while. There is a > fairly regular and constant fight in house over the issue of > upgrading. We get hit on a regular basis with problems that as far > as I know are bugs that have been fixed (transaction log rename > crashes that take down PG, as well as queries just vanishing into > the aether at times of heavy load resulting in hung threads in our > Tomcat front end as it waits for something to come back that has > disappeared). If you could track down some unmodified 1971 Ford Pintos, you could give them some perspective by having them drive those until they upgrade. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
