2009/11/24 Luca Tettamanti <kronos...@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jerry Champlin
> <jchamp...@absolute-performance.com> wrote:
> > You may want to consider using partitioning.  That way you can drop the
> > appropriate partition and never have the overhead of a delete.
>
> Hum, I don't think it's doable in my case; the partitioning is not
> know a priori. First t1 is fully populated, then the data is loaded
> and manipulated by my application, the result is stored in t2; only
> then I want to remove (part of) the data from t1.
>
> thanks,
> Luca
>
>
It's a shame there isn't a LIMIT option on DELETE so this can be done in
small batches.

Thom

Reply via email to