On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Karl Larsson <karl.larsso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Best bet is to post the real problem, not a semi-representational made >> up one. Unless the made up "test case" is truly representative and >> recreates the failure pretty much the same was as the original. > > I agree at some level but I generally believe other people won't read > a big mail like that. In this case it might come to a big post from me > one day soon. :-)
You're on the one mailing list where they will read big posts. It's best if you can attach the explain analyze output as an attachment tho, to keep it's format readable. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
