On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> Yeah, it seems there are two patches here -- one is the addition of >> fsync_fname() and the other is the fsync_prepare stuff.
Sorry, I'm just catching up on my mail from FOSDEM this past weekend. I had come to the same conclusion as Greg that I might as well just commit it with Tom's "pg_flush_data()" name and we can decide later if and when we have pg_fsync_start()/pg_fsync_finish() whether it's worth keeping two apis or not. So I was just going to commit it like that but I discovered last week that I don't have cvs write access set up yet. I'll commit it as soon as I generate a new ssh key and Dave installs it, etc. I intentionally picked a small simple patch that nobody was waiting on because I knew there was a risk of delays like this and the paperwork. I'm nearly there. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
