Greg Smith pisze:
The MegaRAID SAS 84* cards have worked extremely well for me in terms
of performance and features for all the systems I've seen them
installed in. I'd consider it a modest upgrade from that 3ware card,
speed wise.
OK, sounds promising.
The main issue with the MegaRAID cards is that you will have to write
a lot of your own custom scripts to monitor for failures using their
painful MegaCLI utility, and under FreeBSD that also requires using
their Linux utility via emulation:
http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/sysutils/linux-megacli.html
And this is what worries me, as I prefer not to play with utilities too
much, but put the hardware into production, instead. So I'd like to find
more precisely if expected speed boost would pay enough for that pain.
Let me ask the following way then, if such a question makes much sense
with the data I provide. I already have another box with 3ware
9650SE-16ML. With the array configured as follows:
RAID-10, 14 x 500GB Seagate ST3500320NS, stripe size 256K, 16GB RAM,
Xeon X5355, write caching enabled, BBU, FreeBSD 7.2, ufs,
when testing with bonnie++ on idle machine, I got sequential block
read/write around 320MB/290MB and random seeks around 660.
Would that result be substantially better with LSI MegaRAID?
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
