Hi,

Hmm, that's nice, though I cannot but wonder whether the exclusive lock
> required by CLUSTER is going to be a problem in the long run.
>

Not an issue; the inserts are one-time (or very rare; at most: once a year).


>  Hm, keep in mind that if the station clause alone is not selective
> enough, scanning it may be too expensive.  The current three column
>

The seven child tables (split on category ID) have the following indexes:

   1. Primary key (unique ID, sequence)
   2. Station ID (table data is physically inserted by station ID order)
   3. Station ID, Date, and Category ID (this index is CLUSTER'ed)

I agree that the last index is probably all that is necessary. 99% of the
searches use the station ID, date, and category. I don't think PostgreSQL
necessarily uses that last index, though.

Dave

Reply via email to