Jesper Krogh wrote:
On 2010-06-10 19:50, Anne Rosset wrote:
Any advice on how to make it run faster?
What timing do you get if you run it with \t (timing on) and without
explain analyze ?
I would be surprised if you can get it much faster than what is is.. I
may be that a
significant portion is "planning cost" so if you run it a lot you
might benefit from
a prepared statement.
Hi Jesper,
Thanks your response:
psrdb=# \timing
Timing is on.
psrdb=# (SELECT
psrdb(# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank
psrdb(# FROM
psrdb(# item_rank item_rank
psrdb(# WHERE
psrdb(# item_rank.project_id='proj2783'
psrdb(# AND item_rank.pf_id IS NULL
psrdb(#
psrdb(# )
psrdb-# ORDER BY
psrdb-# maxRank DESC;
maxrank
-------------
20200000000
(1 row)
Time: 12.947 ms
It really seems to me that it should take less time.
Specially when I see the result with a different where clause like
this one:
psrdb=# SELECT
psrdb-# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank
psrdb-# FROM
psrdb-# item_rank item_rank
psrdb-# WHERE
psrdb-# item_rank.pf_id='plan1408'
psrdb-# ORDER BY
psrdb-# maxRank DESC;
maxrank
-------------
20504000000
(1 row)
Time: 2.582 ms
Thanks,
Anne
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
