Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 21:19, David Jarvis <thanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I prefer to_timestamp and to_date over the more verbose construct_timestamp.
> Yeah, I agree with that.
Those names are already taken. It will cause confusion (of both people
and machines) if you try to overload them with this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
