Samuel Gendler <sgend...@ideasculptor.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Craig Ringer
> <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
>> If you're not using a connection pool, start using one.
> I see this issue and subsequent advice cross this list awfully
> frequently. Is there in architectural reason why postgres itself
> cannot pool incoming connections in order to eliminate the requirement
> for an external pool?
Perhaps not, but there's no obvious benefit either. Since there's
More Than One Way To Do It, it seems more practical to keep that as a
separate problem that can be solved by a choice of add-on packages.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
