> Fair enough; I'm so used to bumping wal_buffers up to 16MB nowadays that > I forget sometimes that people actually run with the default where this > becomes an important consideration.
Do you have any testing in favor of 16mb vs. lower/higher?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
