Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote: > Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate" >> behavior is what many users seem to want. > Seems that a better solution would be implementing a new -m option > that does this transparently? Maybe. Another option might be to use -t or some new switch (or -t in combination with some new switch) as a time limit before escalating to the next shutdown mode. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
