Dan Harris <f...@drivefaster.net> wrote: > Just another anecdote, I found that the deadline scheduler > performed the best for me. I don't have the benchmarks anymore > but deadline vs cfq was dramatically faster for my tests. I > posted this to the list years ago and others announced similar > experiences. Noop was a close 2nd to deadline. That was our experience when we benchmarked a few years ago. Some more recent benchmarks seem to have shown improvements in cfq, but we haven't had enough of a problem with our current setup to make it seem worth the effort of running another set of benchmarks on that. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
