On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Grittner
<kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> If you model the costing to reflect the reality on your server, good
> plans will be chosen.

Wouldn't it be "better" to derive those costs from actual performance
data measured at runtime?

Say, pg could measure random/seq page cost, *per tablespace* even.

Has that been tried?

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to