On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:41:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.t...@gmail.com> writes: > > If anyone has more suggestions, I would like to hear them. Thank you! > > Provide a test case? > > We recently fixed a couple of O(N^2) loops in pg_dump, but those covered > extremely specific cases that might or might not have anything to do > with what you're seeing. The complainant was extremely helpful about > tracking down the problems: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-03/msg00957.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00225.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00230.php
Yes, please help us improve this! At this point pg_upgrade is limited by the time to dump/restore the database schema, but I can't get users to give me any way to debug the speed problems. Someone reported pg_upgrade took 45 minutes because of pg_dumpall --schema, which is quite long. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
