On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > OK, my fault was to assume you wanted to measure only your part, while > apparently you meant overall savings. But Tom had asked for separate > measurements if I understood him correctly. Also, that measurement of > your change would go after the O(N^2) fix. It could actually turn out > to be much more than 9% because the overall time would be reduced even > more dramatic. So it might actually be good for your fix to wait a > bit. ;-)
It's not clear whether Tom is already working on that O(N^2) fix in locking. I'm asking because it doesn't seem like a complicated patch, contributors may want to get working if not ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
