Hi
We have noticed something strange in the interaction between our Geoserver
instance and Postgres/PostGIS.
After setting Geoserver's log level to include developer debugging, I managed
to capture a single request from Geoserver WMS to PostGIS.
The (shortened) sequence of events and their timestamps:
12:31:22,658 - SELECT query for MSG is sent to Postgres
12:32:10,315 - Rendering for MSG layer starts
12:32:10,356 - DB Connection Closed
========
~ 48 seconds
Interestingly enough, when I execute the same query (MSG) directly from
PgAdmin3:
SELECT "frp_mw",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force_2D("the_geom")),'base64') as
"the_geom" FROM "public"."af_msg_abba_datetime_today" WHERE ("the_geom" &&
GeometryFromText('POLYGON ((-27.67968749408379 -46.92207325648429,
-27.67968749408379 -6.186892358058866, 75.67968748740275 -6.186892358058866,
75.67968748740275 -46.92207325648429, -27.67968749408379 -46.92207325648429))',
4326) AND (("frp_mw" >= -1 AND "frp_mw" <= 150) OR ("frp_mw" >= 151 AND
"frp_mw" <= 300) OR ("frp_mw" >= 301 AND "frp_mw" <= 600) OR ("frp_mw" >= 601
AND "frp_mw" <= 50000)));
I get 6515 rows in 380 ms.
Ie Postgres is able to return the results of the query within 380ms if queried
from PgAdmin3 but Geoserver takes about 48 seconds to get hold of the same
resultset.
Is this some kind of JDBC problem perhaps?
Some details about our setup:
Master Postgres database is on a separate VM from Geoserver, but we replicate
to a slave Postgres cluster on the Geoserver VM (same host). So Geoserver is
referencing the 'localhost' read-only Postgres cluster for its queries.
The 380 ms response time shown above was from the slave Postgres cluster, same
one that Geoserver is using.
All Linux (Ubuntu 11.10) based. Postgres 9.1 PostGIS 1.5 Geoserver 2.1.3
Riaan
--
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail
legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
The full disclaimer details can be found at
http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
