try to increase cpu_tuple_cost to 0.1

On 04/06/2013 03:50, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
If I disable sequential scans, hash joins, and merge joins, the query plans become the same and performance on the first slow one is much improved.

Is there something else I can do to avoid this problem?

below also at https://gist.github.com/joevandyk/34e31b3ad5cccb730a50/raw/8081a4298ba50ac93a86df97c1d0aae482ee7d2d/gistfile1.txt

Aggregate (cost=869360.53..869360.54 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=103.102..103.102 rows=1 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..869164.63 rows=78360 width=0) (actual time=0.253..101.708 rows=8413 loops=1) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..438422.95 rows=56499 width=4) (actual time=0.157..51.766 rows=8178 loops=1) -> Index Scan using index_products_on_drop_shipper_id on products (cost=0.00..2312.56 rows=618 width=4) (actual time=0.087..6.318 rows=618 loops=1)
                     Index Cond: (drop_shipper_id = 221)
-> Index Scan using index_line_items_on_product_id on line_items li (cost=0.00..702.89 rows=279 width=8) (actual time=0.010..0.069 rows=13 loops=618) Index Cond: (product_id = products.id <http://products.id>) -> Index Only Scan using purchased_items_line_item_id_idx on purchased_items pi (cost=0.00..7.60 rows=2 width=4) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=1 loops=8178)
               Index Cond: (line_item_id = li.id <http://li.id>)
               Heap Fetches: 144
 Total runtime: 103.442 ms
(11 rows)



On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Joe Van Dyk <j...@tanga.com <mailto:j...@tanga.com>> wrote:

    On 9.2.4, running two identical queries except for the value of a
    column in the WHERE clause. Postgres is picking very different
    query plans, the first is much slower than the second.

    Any ideas on how I can speed this up?  I have btree indexes for
    all the columns used in the query.

    explain analyze
    SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM purchased_items pi
    inner join line_items li on li.id <http://li.id> = pi.line_item_id
    inner join products      on products.id <http://products.id> =
    li.product_id
    WHERE products.drop_shipper_id = 221;

     Aggregate  (cost=193356.31..193356.32 rows=1 width=0) (actual
    time=2425.225..2425.225 rows=1 loops=1)
       ->  Hash Join  (cost=78864.43..193160.41 rows=78360 width=0)
    (actual time=726.612..2424.206 rows=8413 loops=1)
             Hash Cond: (pi.line_item_id = li.id <http://li.id>)
             ->  Seq Scan on purchased_items pi  (cost=0.00..60912.39
    rows=3724639 width=4) (actual time=0.008..616.812 rows=3724639
    loops=1)
             ->  Hash  (cost=77937.19..77937.19 rows=56499 width=4)
    (actual time=726.231..726.231 rows=8178 loops=1)
                   Buckets: 4096  Batches: 4  Memory Usage: 73kB
                   ->  Hash Join  (cost=1684.33..77937.19 rows=56499
    width=4) (actual time=1.270..723.222 rows=8178 loops=1)
                         Hash Cond: (li.product_id = products.id
    <http://products.id>)
                         ->  Seq Scan on line_items li
     (cost=0.00..65617.18 rows=2685518 width=8) (actual
    time=0.081..392.926 rows=2685499 loops=1)
                         ->  Hash  (cost=1676.60..1676.60 rows=618
    width=4) (actual time=0.835..0.835 rows=618 loops=1)
                               Buckets: 1024  Batches: 1  Memory
    Usage: 22kB
                               ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on products
     (cost=13.07..1676.60 rows=618 width=4) (actual time=0.185..0.752
    rows=618 loops=1)
                                     Recheck Cond: (drop_shipper_id = 221)
                                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on
    index_products_on_drop_shipper_id  (cost=0.00..12.92 rows=618
    width=0) (actual time=0.125..0.125 rows=618 loops=1)
                                           Index Cond:
    (drop_shipper_id = 221)
     Total runtime: 2425.302 ms


    explain analyze
    SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM purchased_items pi
    inner join line_items li on li.id <http://li.id> = pi.line_item_id
    inner join products      on products.id <http://products.id> =
    li.product_id
    WHERE products.drop_shipper_id = 2;


     Aggregate  (cost=29260.40..29260.41 rows=1 width=0) (actual
    time=0.906..0.906 rows=1 loops=1)
       ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..29254.38 rows=2409 width=0)
    (actual time=0.029..0.877 rows=172 loops=1)
             ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..16011.70 rows=1737 width=4)
    (actual time=0.021..0.383 rows=167 loops=1)
                   ->  Index Scan using
    index_products_on_drop_shipper_id on products  (cost=0.00..80.41
    rows=19 width=4) (actual time=0.010..0.074 rows=70 loops=1)
                         Index Cond: (drop_shipper_id = 2)
                   ->  Index Scan using index_line_items_on_product_id
    on line_items li  (cost=0.00..835.70 rows=279 width=8) (actual
    time=0.002..0.004 rows=2 loops=70)
                         Index Cond: (product_id = products.id
    <http://products.id>)
             ->  Index Only Scan using
    purchased_items_line_item_id_idx on purchased_items pi
     (cost=0.00..7.60 rows=2 width=4) (actual time=0.002..0.003 rows=1
    loops=167)
                   Index Cond: (line_item_id = li.id <http://li.id>)
                   Heap Fetches: 5
     Total runtime: 0.955 ms
    (11 rows)



Reply via email to