On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sam Wong <s...@hellosam.net> wrote:
>> This event_log table has 4 million rows.
>>
>> “log_id” is the primary key (bigint),
>>
>> there is a composite index “event_data_search” over (event::text,
>> insert_time::datetime).
>
>
> I think you need to add log_id to that composite index to get pg to use it.
hurk: OP is two statistics misses (one of them massive that are
combing to gobsmack you).
your solution unfortuantely wont work: you can't combine two range
searches in a single index scan. it would probably work if you it
like this. If insert_time is a timestamp, not a timestamptz, we can
convert it to date to get what I think he wants (as long as his
queries are along date boundaries).
how about:
CREATE INDEX ON event_log(event_id, insert_time::date, log_id);
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT * FROM event_log
WHERE
(event_id, insert_time::date, log_id) >= ('S-Create',
'2013-09-15'::date, 0)
AND event_id = 'S-Create' AND insert_time::date < '2013-09-16'::date
ORDER BY
event_id, insert_time::date, log_id
LIMIT 1
if insert_time is a timestamptz, we can materialize the date into the
table to get around that (timestamptz->date is a stable expression).
If date boundary handling is awkward, our best bet is probably to hack
the planner with a CTE. Note the above query will smoke the CTE based
one.
WITH data AS
(
SELECT log_id FROM event_log
WHERE event='S-Create' AND
insert_time>'2013-09-15' and insert_time<'2013-09-16'
)
SELECT * from data ORDER BY log_id LIMIT 1;
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
