btw, 9.4 should be wiser in case of rare+common terms,
thanks to GIN fast scan feature.

I'll look forward to it! We have a few other GIN indexes . . .

I don't want to misrepresent my impression of Postgres performance; the only other case where I've made a significant improvement by tweaking was pre-checking a couple of tables with count(*) > 0 before using them against several thousand submissions (checking lists of blocked artists and keywords against submission details). I've been pleasantly surprised at what it can handle, especially after index-only scans came out.

--
Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to