On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran <tigran.mkrtch...@desy.de> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mark Kirkwood" <mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz> >> To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmonc...@gmail.com>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan" >> <tigran.mkrtch...@desy.de> >> Cc: "postgres performance list" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org> >> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:56:36 PM >> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4 >> >> On 19/09/14 08:32, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran >> > <tigran.mkrtch...@desy.de> wrote: >> >> >> >> 9.3.5: >> >> 0.035940 END; >> >> >> >> >> >> 9.4beta2: >> >> 0.957854 END; >> > > > 10 minutes run had the same results. > > Is there some kind of statistics which can tell there time is spend? > Or the only way is to run on solaris with dtrace? For me it's more important > to find why I get only 1500tps with 9.3. The test with 9.4 was just a hope for > a magic code change that will give me a better performance.
Can you test 9.3 on the 9.4 computer? Regards -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
