On 10/29/2014 11:49 PM, Tory M Blue wrote: > I looked at pgtune again today and the numbers it's spitting out took me > back, they are huge. From all historical conversations and attempts a few > of these larger numbers netted reduced performance vs better performance > (but that was on older versions of Postgres).
Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date. It's been on my TODO list, as I'm sure it has been on Greg's. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
