On 2015-04-13 17:49, Jeff Janes wrote: > > One way would be to lock dirty buffers from unlogged relations into > shared_buffers (which hardly seems like a good thing) until the start of a > "super-checkpoint" and then write them all out as fast as possible (which kind > of defeats checkpoint_completion_target). And then if the crash happened > during a super-checkpoint, the data would still be inconsistent and need to be > truncated. >
What do you call a "super-checkpoint"? -- http://yves.zioup.com gpg: 4096R/32B0F416 -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
