> On 16 Mar 2016, at 16:37, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com> writes:
>> 1. Why isnt' folder_id part of the index-cond?
>
> Because a GIN index is useless for sorting.
I don't see how gin inability to return sorted data relates to index condition.
In fact i tried to reproduce the example,
and if i change folder_id to int from bigint, then index condition with
folder_id is used
Index Cond: ((fts_all @@ '''hi'''::tsquery) AND (folder_id = 1))
>
>> 2. Is there a way to make it use the (same) index to sort by
>> received_timestamp?
>
> No.
>
>> 3. Using a GIN-index, is there a way to use the index at all for sorting?
>
> No.
>
>> 4. It doesn't seem like ts_rank uses the index for sorting either.
>
> Same reason.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
