Mike Castle wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 11:10:00AM +0100, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
>> - Sequences are not rollback'able.
>
>Did you mean SERIAL instead of sequence here?
>
>If so, why is no rollbackable an issue? All you should need is unique
>numbers. Not necessarily exactly sequential numbers.
For invoice numbers, it matters.
Numbers missing from such a sequence are likely to provoke questions from
auditors and taxmen; why borrow trouble?
--
Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to
us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And
His name will be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty
God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."
Isaiah 9:6
