Re: [SQL] plpgsql grief

[Tom Lane]

Michael Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that the discussion on this topic resolved that the AS syntax
> would work as I described, and the INTO syntax would be removed because of
> ambiguity, to be redeveloped at a later date?

INTO has indeed been removed.  However, AS does not do what you seem
to think it does; in fact, it is entirely a noise clause in this
context.

                        regards, tom lane