Pater, Robbie, Bruce,
> > Hey! I thought you couldn't do ORDER BY in views ... yet I just
> did.
> > Is this a new thing, or am I just getting my Trasact-SQL and my
> > PostgreSQL mixed up again?
>
> I think it was allowed from 7.1 on to enable LIMIT in views to work
> sensibly.
Makes sense. I take it that this is a deviation from the ANSI 92
standard, then?
What happens if I put an ORDER BY in a view, then call an ORDER BY in a
query, e.g.:
CREATE VIEW test_view AS
SELECT client_name, city, zip FROM clients
WHERE zip IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY zip;
SELECT * FROM test_view ORDER BY city;
Does the second ORDER BY override or suppliment the view ORDER BY, or is
it ignored?
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
