On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:36:59 -0700, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I, for one, would judge that the start time of the statement is "during the >execution"; it would only NOT be "during the execution" if it was a value >*before* the start time of the statement. It's a semantic argument.
Josh, you're right, I meant closed interval. >Further, we could not change that behaviour without breaking many people's >applications. > >Ideally, since we get this question a lot, that a compile-time or >execution-time switch to change the behavior of current_timestamp >contextually would be nice. Yes, GUC! >We just need someone who;s interested enough in >writing one. First we need someone who decyphers SQL99's wording. Servus Manfred ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
