Tom,
> > INSERT INTO order_spec ( job_type, order_usq, no_needed, start_time,
> > end_time, pay_rate, bill_rate )
> > VALUES ( current_type, new_usq, numbers[spec_loop],
>sttimes[spec_loop],
> > endtimes[spec_loop],
> > pays[spec_loop], bills[spec_loop] );
>
> Um, might v_usq be different from new_usq?
No, actually; there's a declaration earlier that assigns them the same value
for existing records. Plus "new_usq" is the link to the orders record, so
if they were different I wouldn't ever see the extra records.
I just tried to set up a test case for this issue, based on much simpler
schema. Unfortunately, the bug is not reproduceable in this simple case.
Any suggestions on how to reproduce it without dumping you an enitre copy of
my *confidential* database design?
--
-Josh Berkus
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
