perfect, its one of those that I've used so rarely, I never thought about it ... thanks :)
On Sat, 15 Jun 2003, deststar wrote: > Isn't that what the having clause is about? > - Stuart > > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 00:31, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > I have a query that looks like: > > > > SELECT SUM(bytes) AS traffic > > FROM traffic_table > > GROUP BY ip; > > > > I want to narrow that SELECT down to a subset, like: > > > > SELECT SUM(bytes) AS traffic > > FROM traffic_table > > WHERE traffic < ( 100 * 1024 * 1024 ) > > GROUP BY ip; > > > > which, of course, won't work, cause I need to do the GROUP BY before I do > > the WHERE ... but there has to be a way of coding that so that it does > > work :( > > > > I'm overlooking something obvious here ... I think? > > > > Thanks ... > > > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > > primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|postgresql}.org > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > > joining column's datatypes do not match > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|postgresql}.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
