Joe, > After re-reading it, I think it is related to (or at least similar to) > the work Tom is currently doing to allow composite types as table > attributes.
That's what I thought at first as well, and told the requestor that we would support them in the next two versions. But reading that paragraph makes me think that the type is somehow supposed to contain metadata or summary data for the table itself. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly