Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a reason postgres goes out of its way to pick names that
> will be harder to work with than necessary?
If we use ordinary identifiers for system-generated names then we will
be infringing on user name space --- ie, there's a potential for
conflict. I suppose we could use long randomly-generated names like
ewjncm343cnlen, but are those really easier to work with?
I think a more useful approach is to treat it as a documentation
problem. Perhaps an example in the ALTER TABLE man page would help.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
