Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 18:13:23 +0000, > Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the > > sql standard dirty read. > > No. There will be a way to use the standard name in a SET command, but > you will actaully get READ COMMITTED isolation (which is the next step up).
I wonder how hard this would be to implement. It doesn't seem like it should be very hard. It would be very convenient for debugging and for checking on the progress of large batch updates or loads. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
