Need help on this problem. I've created two functions. The function should perform a few sql processes. The problem is I got different results when I call the function and when I manually run the sql command.

I'm using postgresql 7.4.2.

The two functions involved are
CREATE TABLE sensor_signature ( sid             INTEGER,
                               rh_sign_id      INTEGER,
                               PRIMARY KEY (sid,rh_sign_id));

CREATE TABLE rule_header ( rh_sign_id   INTEGER,
                          rh_status    INTEGER,
                          rh_action    VARCHAR(6),
                          proto        VARCHAR(10),
                          source_ip    VARCHAR(255),
                          source_port  VARCHAR(64),
                          dest_ip      VARCHAR(255),
                          dest_port    VARCHAR(64),
                          dir_operator VARCHAR(64),
                          category     VARCHAR(64),
                          rh_revision  INTEGER,
                          timestamp    timestamp,
                          rh_ord       INTEGER,
                          PRIMARY KEY (rh_sign_id));

And my functions are

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_sen_sig (integer, varchar)
RETURNS integer AS '
DECLARE
sign_id alias FOR $1;
category alias FOR $2;
temp_sid integer;
temp_category varchar;
T1Cursor refcursor;
BEGIN
select * into temp_category from get_root_path(category);
OPEN T1Cursor FOR
SELECT sid FROM conf_category WHERE
category_name like temp_category and category_status=1;
LOOP
FETCH T1Cursor INTO temp_sid;
EXIT WHEN NOT FOUND;
INSERT INTO sensor_signature VALUES (temp_sid, sign_id);
RAISE NOTICE '' INSERT INTO sensor_signature VALUES % % '', temp_sid,sign_id;
END LOOP;
CLOSE T1Cursor;
--- COMMIT;
RETURN 0;
END;
' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';


CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION rule_header_add (integer,integer,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,varchar,integer,integer)

RETURNS integer AS '
DECLARE
var_f0 alias FOR $1; -- rh_sign_id
var_f1 alias FOR $2; -- rh_status
var_f2 alias FOR $3; -- rh_action
var_f3 alias FOR $4; -- proto
var_f4 alias FOR $5; -- source_ip
var_f5 alias FOR $6; -- source_port
var_f6 alias FOR $7; -- dest_ip
var_f7 alias FOR $8; -- dest_port
var_f8 alias FOR $9; -- dir_operator
var_f9 alias FOR $10; -- category
var_f10 alias FOR $11; -- rh_revision
var_f11 alias FOR $12; -- rh_ord
curtime timestamp;
var_temp_RH_ORD integer;
BEGIN
curtime := current_timestamp;
SELECT rh_ord INTO var_temp_RH_ORD FROM rule_header
WHERE rh_sign_id = var_f0;
IF NOT FOUND THEN
INSERT INTO rule_header
VALUES (var_f0,var_f1,var_f2,var_f3,var_f4,var_f5,var_f6,var_f7,var_f8,var_f9,var_f10,curtime,var_f11);


RAISE NOTICE '' INSERT INTO rule_header VALUES % % % % % % % % % % % % '', var_f0,var_f1,var_f2,var_f3,var_f4,var_f5,var_f6,var_f7,var_f8,var_f9,var_f10,curtime,var_f11;
--- select update_sen_sig(var_f0,var_f9);
perform update_sen_sig(var_f0,var_f9);
RETURN 0;
ELSE
UPDATE rule_header SET rh_status=var_f1, rh_action=var_f2, proto=var_f3,source_ip=var_f4, source_port=var_f5, dest_ip=var_f6, dest_port=var_f7, dir_operator=var_f8, category=var_f9, rh_revision=var_f10, timestamp=curtime, rh_ord=var_temp_RH_ORD where rh_sign_id=var_f0;
DELETE FROM rule_option where rh_sign_id=var_f0;
RETURN 1;
END IF;
END;
' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';


Issue is
cews=> select
rule_header_add(999,1,'alert','ip','$EXTERNAL_NET','any','$HOME_NET','any','->','dos.rules',3,0);
NOTICE:   INSERT INTO rule_header VALUES 999 1 alert ip $EXTERNAL_NET any
$HOME_NET any -> dos.rules 3 2004-06-04 15:21:30.448633
NOTICE:   INSERT INTO sensor_signature VALUES -1 999
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "rule_header_add" line 26 at perform
ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique constraint "sensor_signature_pkey"
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "update_sen_sig" line 16 at SQL statement
PL/pgSQL function "rule_header_add" line 26 at perform

I thought it might be caused by duplicated data. But ...
cews=> insert into rule_header values
(268,1,'alert','ip','$EXTERNAL_NET','any','$HOME_NET','any','->','dos.rules',3,current_timestamp,0);
INSERT 29393 1

And
cews=> insert into sensor_signature values (-1,268);
INSERT 29394 1

That commands work perfectly. Could somebody tell me why and how to solve this. Thanks.

Azmi


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to