Luis,

wow.... at first I thought I had my head around a leap
year problem so I advanced your query a year....

testbed=# SELECT age('2005-05-14
16:00'::timestamp,'2005-02-18 16:00'::timestamp);
      age       
----------------
 2 mons 24 days
(1 row)

testbed =# SELECT '2005-02-18 16:00'::timestamp +'2
mons 24 days'::interval;
      ?column?       
---------------------
 2005-05-12 16:00:00
(1 row)

I just thought I would let you know it can get
worse..... :) I don't know how daylight savings time
is playing this problem... but I didn't expect the
problem to grow like that.

Ted

--- Luis Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm using PostgreSQL 7.3.3 on i386-pc-linux-gnu,
> compiled by GCC gcc 
> (GCC) 3.3 (Debian), and I don't understand the
> results of the following 
> queries:
> 
> 
> SELECT age('2004-05-14 16:00'::timestamp,'2004-02-18
> 16:00'::timestamp);
>       age      
> ----------------
>  2 mons 25 days
> 
> SELECT '2004-02-18 16:00'::timestamp+'2 mons 25
> days'::interval;
>       ?column?      
> ---------------------
>  2004-05-13 16:00:00
> 
> In this case, the age from 2004-05-14 16:00 to
> 2004-02-18 16:00 is 2 
> mons 25 days, but if I add the age to the initial
> date, it returns one 
> day less!?
> 
> SELECT age('2004-05-26 16:00'::timestamp,'2004-02-18
> 16:00'::timestamp);
>       age     
> ---------------
>  3 mons 8 days
> 
> SELECT '2004-02-18 16:00'::timestamp+'3 mons 8
> days'::interval;
>       ?column?      
> ---------------------
>  2004-05-26 16:00:00
> 
> Here, the age between 2004-05-26 16:00 and
> 2004-02-18 16:00 is 3 mons 8 
> days, and this interval added to the initial date
> gives the correct result!!
> 



                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to