Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't quite understand how I am wrong in saying that PostgreSQL does > not use UNIX epoch timestamps internally, as you've clearly explained > it doesn't.
We are talking at cross-purposes. I thought you were suggesting that PG doesn't use a seconds-from-epoch form at all, but some other format (such as perhaps separate yyyy/mm/dd/hh/mm/ss fields). Sorry if I added to the confusion instead of dispelling it. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match