Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fixing this properly is a research project, and I haven't thought of any > quick-and-dirty hacks that aren't too ugly to consider :-(
Just thinking out loud here. Instead of trying to peek inside the CASE couldn't the optimizer just wrap the non-strict expression in a conditional that tests whether the row was found? -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
