Re: [SQL] pg primary key bug?

[pginfo]

Ragnar Hafstað wrote:

On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 10:33 +0100, pginfo wrote:
  

  
We are using  jdbc (jdbc driver from pg)  + jboss (java based
application server) + connection pool (biult in jboss).
...
Will vacuum full generate this problem if we have locked table in this
time? (It is possible to have locked table in theory)
    

I do not know if this is relevant, but I have seen jboss applications
keep sessions in 'Idle in transaction' state, apparently with some
locks granted. Would such cases not interfere with vacuum?

gnari

  

Only to add,
also keeping sme transactions for long time not commited (possible).
regards,
ivan.