Why would you then drop the index? Performance and storage issues? I imagine
that I would cluster the table at regular intervals to maintain the ordering,
so I'd need to to keep the index around, yes?
--- PFC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Is it even possible to cluster a table based on the clustering scheme
> > (which is
> > not the link_id ...) from the master table?
> >
> > Can you gurus think of a better strategy? :) (Please??) :)
>
> You can create a functional index on a function which returns the
> desired
> order by looking in the main table, cluster it, then drop the index...
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
____________________________________________________
Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
