Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Are there any data types that can hold pretty much any type of > character? UTF-16 isn't supported (or its missing from teh docs), and > UTF-8 doesn't appear to have a big enough range ...
UTF-8 has exactly the same "range" as UTF-16. In any case, the UTF-8 encoding in PostgreSQL is probably your best choice, unless you want to dig into the weirdness that is MULE_INTERNAL. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
