On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 13:08 -0800, chester c young wrote:Well, this works:Yes, I did a VACUUM ANALYZE on the entire database before running this query. Also, I get an error with your suggestion:> Here is my query SQL: > > SELECT key100 FROM ncccr10 > WHERE ncccr10.key100 NOT IN (SELECT key100 FROM ncccr9); > > It is is running after 30 minutes. Here is the query plan: > I would try an outer join: select a.key100 from ncccr10 a left join ncccr9 b on( key100 ) where b.key100 is null; also (hate to be obvious) have you analyzed lately? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
csalgorithm=# SELECT a.key100 FROM ncccr10 a
csalgorithm-# LEFT JOIN ncccr9 b ON(a.key100)
csalgorithm-# WHERE b.key100 IS Null;
ERROR: argument of JOIN/ON must be type boolean, not type character
SELECT *
FROM ncccr9 a
LEFT JOIN ncccr10 b USING( key100 )
WHERE b.key100 is null;
It still seems slow. It takes about the same time to run as in MS Access. I thought PostgreSQL would be faster.