Well, the query is working ok numerically, but should the answer really
be reported as 4 days and 33 hours?
Erik
Aaron Bono wrote:
Right, the 23 is just less than 1 day, not 23 days.
The good news: your query is working!
-Aaron
On 6/26/06, *Joe* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jeremiah Elliott" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
writes:
>> however if i don't average them here is what i get:
>> "7 days 22:24:50.62311";"*2420"
>> "9 days 22:21: 02.683393";"*2420"
>> "23:21:35.458459";"*2420"
>> "4 days 22:47:41.749756";"*2420"
>> "3 days 06:05:59.456947";"*2420"
>
>> which should average to just over nine days -
>
> Uh ... how do you arrive at that conclusion? I haven't done the
math,
> but by eyeball an average of four-something days doesn't look
out of
> line for those values.
It seems he's calculating (7 + 9 + 23 + 4 + 3) / 5 ...
Joe
--
erik jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
software development
emma(r)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
