Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And why multiple databases instead of multiple schemas within the > same database? Or even all data in the same schema? Is there a > reason for the segregation?
I can think that spreading processing requirements should be one. And distributing load another one. Disk space can be solved with new disks and tablespaces, but we can't yet distribute the load through several servers without partitioning. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
