On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
This seems pretty darn weird.  I am wondering about corrupt indexes ---
can you find the indicated key in either table if you set
enable_indexscan and enable_bitmapscan to 0?

That's not actually the test case I asked for ...

hahah, I wondered why you wanted me to disable seqscan...turns out you didn't! I just misread it. :-)


Nope, I guess I didn't \d visit..thought I did...it's below.  I'm going to
guess that there is index corruption and a reindex page_view will fix it.  Do
you want me to gather any information in case this is a reproducible bug
before I issue the reindex?

I'm thinking the same --- please save a physical copy of
page_view_visit_idx before you reindex it, and if that fixes the
problem, please send me copies of both the before and after states
of the index.

Well, interestingly, it seems to work now for some reason even though the cleanup script has failed three nights in a row and I haven't reindexed yet. Seems quite strange. I guess now I'll have to wait and see if it fails again tonight.

BTW, just to make sure I get the right file to ship over if we have this again, it would be: /var/lib/pgsql/data/base/9366228/16204210 yes?

select * from pg_stat_user_indexes where indexrelname = 'page_view_visit_idx';
relid | indexrelid | schemaname | relname | indexrelname | idx_scan | idx_tup_read | idx_tup_fetch
---------+------------+------------+-----------+---------------------+----------+--------------+---------------
9366257 | 16204210 | public | page_view | page_view_visit_idx | 5652735 | 1540722403 | 1524420263
(1 row)


--
Jeff Frost, Owner       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frost Consulting, LLC   http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908     FAX: 650-649-1954

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to