Dnia Thu, 24 May 2007 12:54:48 +0100, Tomas Doran napisał(a): > If I can do something to make it work in the postgres backend, then that'd > be acceptable, and I'm investigating that..
>From what I know it's impossible without touching the source. > This is, at the very least, is a glaring inconsistency around how IN > clauses are handled in different situations. Yes, I think you are right. > If this was a deliberate tightning of the behavior, is there a changelog > entry/link to come docs about when this change happened that anyone can > point me to? I am not able to trace this particular change right now (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/release.html). While you are right that these changes should be perhaps better documented, such comparisions were a bad thing to do in the first place (I've learned my lesson while upgrading from I think 7.1b3 to 7.1.3). Unfortunately I see no other option than fixing them in your application. -- | And Do What You Will be the challenge | http://apcoln.linuxpl.org | So be it in love that harms none | http://biznes.linux.pl | For this is the only commandment. | http://www.juanperon.info `---* JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *---' http://www.naszedzieci.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
