> I just lost a months worth of stats data myself, so join the club. It > wasn't critical data, but it would have been nice to have kept > around...
I also think there could be a TODO item in it. If vacuum instead of removing items, somehow stashed them away in a storage limited archive it would be possible to do a SELECT...AS OF TIMESTAMP. The idea is of course to be able to retrieve rows that really are deleted, but are still on disk as non-vacuumed or vacuumed and not removed completely. And it would also take a 2. stage vacuumer to keep the storage within its limits. I don't say it's an important feature, but it would come in handy for people who really really need it. And perhaps a developer wouldn't mind scratching this itch some time in the future. -- Med venlig hilsen Kaare Rasmussen, Jasonic Jasonic Telefon: +45 3816 2582 Nordre Fasanvej 12 2000 Frederiksberg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
