Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Steve Johnson wrote:
>> update certgroups
>> set termgroupname = tg.termgroupname
>> from certgroups c, termgroup tg
>> where (c.days >= tg.mindays) and (c.days <= tg.maxdays);
> In recent PostgreSQL versions I believe this is properly written:
> update certgroups c
> set termgroupname = tg.termgroupname
> from termgroup tg
> where (c.days >= tg.mindays) and (c.days <= tg.maxdays);
Yeah, in PG's eyes the former is creating a cartesian join between two
versions of certgroups. I think MSSQL interprets the FROM reference as
being the same as the update target, but we don't.
> At least as of SQL2003, I think both of the above use extensions,
Correct, the standard disallows a FROM clause altogether; and I'm not
sure that they weren't right. No matter which way you resolve the above
ambiguity, you've still got the problem that the update behavior is
ill-defined if a given target row joins to more than one set of rows
from the other table(s).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
