Hello Richard,
Richard Huxton a écrit :
>> I saw somwhere it could be the order of the fields ?
>
> Not if you are doing "SELECT * FROM".
>
> Create an empty test database and a short script to create the table and
> function, insert a couple of rows then call the function. If you wrap
> the whole thing in BEGIN ... ROLLBACK we can change things until we see
> the problem.
>
> The other thing you could try is printing out row before returning it:
> RAISE NOTICE 'row = %', row;
> RETURN NEXT ROW;
> It might be you've not got what you were expecting.
Thanks a lot, good idea...
But it looks good :
> SELECT * FROM rma.test ('19G256259');
> NOTICE: row = (12066602,19G256259,170224,PN6405B,2009-09-22,"FORERUNNER 405
> NOIR",2009-09-22,15090,14748)
> ERREUR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
> CONTEXTE : PL/pgSQL function "test" line 12 at return next
>
> \d rma.serial_number
> Table « rma.serial_number »
> Colonne | Type | Modificateurs
> -------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
> sn_id | bigint | not null default
> nextval('rma.serial_number_sn_id_seq'::regclass)
> sn | character varying(30) |
> no_client | integer |
> no_art_bw | character varying(11) |
> sn_fc_date | date |
> desc_fr | character varying(40) |
> sn_cm_date | date |
> no_facture | integer |
> no_commande | integer |
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
