No. Strangely enough they don't in enforce this limit. Brent DeSpain Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Andrej <andrej.gro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 May 2010 07:33, Brent DeSpain <bd.postg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the docs > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TABLE > > it says that Regular Expression bounds {m,n} that m and n can be 0-255. > Is > > there a way to extend the upper limit. We are trying to be consistent > > between Regular Expressionimplementation an the other implementations do > not > > have this limit. > Interesting. The POSIX standard for REs dictates this limit; which > implementations > you're using don't adhere to it? > > > Cheers, > Andrej > > > > > -- > Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes > concise. > > http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm >
