El jue, 03-02-2011 a las 20:47 +0100, Pavel Stehule escribió: > Hello > > If you use a record expansion over function's result, then function is > called once for record's field. > > so don't do it on slow functions. > > Regards > > Pavel > > > 2011/2/3 Gerardo Herzig <gher...@fmed.uba.ar>: > > Hi all, im using a function of my own in a subquery, and when wonderig > > about the slowliness of this one, y relalize that: > > > > test=# SELECT (_xxfunction(854,'711H',11,false)).* ; > > (4 filas) > > --Result DELETED > > Duración: 1069,465 ms > > > > > > glyms=# SELECT * from _xxfunction(854,'711H',11,false) ; > > (4 filas) > > Duración: 228,699 ms > > > > For privacy reasons, i just deleted the result and the function name, > > but the resulst are obviously exactly the same, and the ().* form (which > > i needed) is taking so much more...there is a reason why? A workaround? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Gerardo > > > > > > -- > > Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) > > To make changes to your subscription: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql > > >
Mmmmm ok Thanks...So there is no workaround/alternative to this? Gerardo -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
